Methodology

The GEO Scoring Framework

How CiteFlow measures AI visibility across 15 engines. Transparent scoring criteria. 0 to 100 score. Updated May 2026.

Overview

CiteFlow's GEO scoring framework evaluates businesses on a 0 to 100 scale based on how visible they are across AI-powered search engines. The score is calculated by auditing 15 AI engines across 3 tiers — a methodology we publish publicly so you can understand exactly how your score is calculated.

This transparency is intentional. We believe GEO can only be effective if the metrics are clear and verifiable.

The 3-Tier Engine Architecture

CiteFlow audits AI engines in three tiers, reflecting how users actually discover businesses:

TierEnginesWeight in ScoreUpdate FrequencyWhy It Matters
Tier 1 — Primary AI SearchChatGPT (OpenAI), Perplexity AI, Google AI Overviews (SGE), Claude (Anthropic), Microsoft Copilot50%Real-timePrimary discovery tools for most users
Tier 2 — Emerging AI PlatformsGrok (xAI), DeepSeek, Meta AI (Facebook), Samsung Galaxy AI, Xiaomi AI30%WeeklyGrowing usage, especially in specific demographics
Tier 3 — Reference & ResearchPerplexity Pages, NotebookLM, Phind, You.com, Komo AI, Phind20%MonthlyUsed by power users and professionals for B2B decisions

The 15 AI Engines Audited

Why 15 engines? AI visibility isn't just about ChatGPT. Different audiences use different AI platforms. A Moroccan business traveler might use Grok or DeepSeek. A marketing manager uses Copilot. A researcher uses Perplexity Pages. CiteFlow tracks all of them so you're not optimizing for one platform at the expense of the others.

EngineCompanyTypeLanguage Support
ChatGPTOpenAIPrimary AI SearchFR, EN, AR + 95 languages
Perplexity AIPerplexityPrimary AI SearchFR, EN + 30 languages
Google AI OverviewsGooglePrimary AI SearchFR, EN, AR
ClaudeAnthropicPrimary AI SearchFR, EN, AR + 10 languages
Microsoft CopilotMicrosoftPrimary AI SearchFR, EN + 40 languages
GrokxAI (Musk)Emerging AIEN, FR
DeepSeekDeepSeekEmerging AIEN, ZH, FR
Meta AIMetaEmerging AIFR, EN, AR
Samsung Galaxy AISamsungEmerging AIFR, EN, AR
Perplexity PagesPerplexityReference & ResearchEN, FR
NotebookLMGoogleReference & ResearchEN, FR
PhindPhindReference & ResearchEN, FR
You.comYou.comReference & ResearchEN, FR
Komo AIKomoReference & ResearchEN, FR
Arc SearchArc BrowserReference & ResearchEN, FR

Scoring Criteria

Each engine audit evaluates 4 dimensions:

1. Entity Recognition (25%)

Does the AI know your business exists as a distinct entity? Checked by asking category queries ("best accounting firm in Casablanca") and entity queries ("is [Business Name] a real company"). Scored: 0 if never mentioned, 25 if occasionally mentioned in context, 25 if reliably mentioned and contextually accurate.

2. Content Quality Signals (30%)

Is your content structured in a way AI engines can extract and cite? Evaluated through: Schema.org markup presence, structured FAQ content, factual/statistical claims in content, recency of information (publication date), and semantic clarity (clear headings, direct answers). Scored 0-30 based on how many quality signals are present.

3. Authority & Credibility (25%)

Does the AI trust your business as a credible source? Evaluated through: mentions in authoritative sources, consistency of information across the web (NAP), presence of reviews and testimonials in AI-accessible content, and year/founding date in entity description. Scored 0-25 based on number and quality of authority signals.

4. Semantic Relevance (20%)

Does your content directly answer the queries your target audience asks AI? Evaluated by running your target category queries ("best hotel Marrakech", "accounting firm Rabat") and checking if your business appears in the answer. Scored 0-20 based on match rate across representative queries.

Score Calculation

Final score = weighted average of all 15 engines:

Example: If Tier 1 avg = 30, Tier 2 avg = 25, Tier 3 avg = 20 → Score = (30×0.50) + (25×0.30) + (20×0.20) = 15 + 7.5 + 4 = 26.5/100

Score Interpretation

Score RangeLevelWhat It MeansAction
0-10InvisibleAI does not know your business existsStart from basics: Schema.org + About page
11-25WeakMentioned occasionally but not in contextAdd structured content + FAQ pages
26-40DevelopingAppears in some queries with partial contextAuthority building + content strategy
41-60ModerateRegularly cited with decent contextFine-tune + expand multilingual coverage
61-80StrongReliable AI citation with good contextMaintain + add original data/Research
81-100AuthorityGo-to citation for category queriesProtect + expand into adjacent categories

Moroccan Market Benchmarks

Based on 138 real audits in Morocco (January-May 2026):

28
Average score across all Moroccan businesses
27
Average ChatGPT score for Moroccan businesses
29
Average Google AI score for Moroccan businesses
13%
Businesses that score above 50 (strong level)

Why publish this? CiteFlow believes in transparent, verifiable metrics. If you want to estimate your score without using our platform, apply the criteria above to your website and content. The scoring is deterministic — the same inputs always produce the same outputs. This framework is what CiteFlow uses internally; we publish it so clients understand exactly what we're measuring.

Audit Frequency

CiteFlow runs AI visibility audits at three frequencies depending on plan level:

AI engines update their knowledge bases at unpredictable intervals. Monthly is the minimum for tracking meaningful change. Weekly is recommended for competitive industries. Daily is for businesses where AI citations directly impact revenue (tourism, hospitality, high-ticket B2B).

Run Your Own Audit

Apply our methodology to your business. Free, takes 30 seconds.

Free AI Visibility Audit